-
Can Institutional Fragmentation Become a Form of Ecological Toxicity?
Recently, I’ve started to think about toxicity not only as something material, chemical, or relational, but also as something structural.
In ecology, we often recognize toxic substances, damaged landscapes, or harmful economic practices as sources of harm. But I’m beginning to wonder whether some ecological problems also emerge from the way stewardship and its supporting institutions are organized.
What happens when ecological systems operate across large regions and long time horizons, but the institutions responsible for stewardship are divided by different mandates, goals, funding cycles, and decision-making processes?
Could fragmentation between institutions become its own form of ecological toxicity?
Fragmentation is not always harmful, but ecological relationships often extend beyond the boundaries of the systems we use to manage them.
If ecological design aims to create healthier and more restorative systems, perhaps we should also think about institutional design as part of that work.
How do we build stewardship systems capable of continuity, accountability, collaboration, and long-horizon ecological care?
I’d be interested in how others here think about ecological design beyond materials, sites, or built projects—especially where governance, stewardship, shared responsibility, or institutional continuity become part of the design challenge.
Are there examples, projects, or frameworks you’ve found useful for addressing ecological harm at a structural or institutional level?
PFA: CAV – the Camp Alone Van and Author @ Bears Ears National Monument, UT
-
1 Reply
-
“How do we build stewardship systems capable of continuity, accountability, collaboration, and long-horizon ecological care?” — Such a great question! And an essential matter. The kind of institutional fragmentation you’re talking about becomes toxic, as it were, when different institutions work at cross-purposes, fall into arrangements that are highly unequal and exploitative, or are put in the position of competing for resources with potential partners and collaborators. So what does it take, structurally and systemically, to put conditions into place for effective allyship and coalition-building? This is one of the themes that Shashawnda Campbell (SBCLT) and I write about in this recent dialogue of ours about environmental justice collaborations in Baltimore, which could be a relevant read:
https://www.culanth.org/fieldsights/teaching-and-organizing-for-environmental-justice-in-baltimore
culanth.org
Teaching and Organizing for Environmental Justice in Baltimore
Baltimore’s residents of color are twice as likely as white residents to develop cancer from toxic exposure, and suffer some of the highest asthm...
Log in to reply.